I remember election day in '08. They were parsing out the count until 9:00 PM (here in Cali) but it was already clear that Obama would win because of California. There was so much hope then!
And truth to tell we got a lot of change. Not everything we wanted but a lot of good stuff.
And the model is based on only 7 events (1984, '88, '92, '96, 2000, '04, '12), so it's not that profound a statistical inference.
Which has nothing to do with my past support for Bernie. I'm just sayin' you can find statistical correlations for a lotta things, but you must be careful to avoid confusing correlation and causation.
<img src="http://wonkville.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Hillarys-inauguration-thanks-Trump.jpg">
http://www.270towin.com/maps/qgy3D
Story checks out.
I'm hoping so. Looks pretty good right now!
I remember election day in '08. They were parsing out the count until 9:00 PM (here in Cali) but it was already clear that Obama would win because of California. There was so much hope then!
And truth to tell we got a lot of change. Not everything we wanted but a lot of good stuff.
He would say his bags of dicks are bigger and more grand–24K PLATED!
Maybe brass plated. Maybe only anodized.
Don't get cocky, fucknuts!
Nah, I just like saying that. it's a great line from a so-so movie called Beer League.
Trust me, the e-mail thing will prevent me from doing that!
It was good for me too.
And the model is based on only 7 events (1984, '88, '92, '96, 2000, '04, '12), so it's not that profound a statistical inference.
Which has nothing to do with my past support for Bernie. I'm just sayin' you can find statistical correlations for a lotta things, but you must be careful to avoid confusing correlation and causation.
As everyone here already knows. Go Hillary!
I don't think so, it doesn't have the required oxide layer on the surface.
[No.]