untitled

WaPo interviews a conspiracy-loving Trump supporter and it’s every bit as horrifying as you’d imagine it would be

10 thoughts on “WaPo interviews a conspiracy-loving Trump supporter and it’s every bit as horrifying as you’d imagine it would be

  1. tl/grew filled with disgust about halfway down the page. The self-evident contradiction of a woman who wins a sexual harassment suit supporting the candidate for Sexual-Harasser-in-Chief, who might well have fired her for not being young or pretty enough….living on disability but no doubt angry about all "those people" living on welfare….gah….

    Also: reading a WaPo page in an incognito window without protection gives me visual heebie-jeebies. So much junk in the way of the "content"!

  2. She was usually the only woman on a crew, but she prided herself on being tough, so when she heard that some higher-up had called a colleague and asked, “What’s Austin wearing today, her green miniskirt?” Melanie laughed it off. She ignored the boss who she said left a Penthouse magazine on her desk. But then came the sexually explicit graffiti about her in the train toilets, and a male colleague’s calling her “psycho bitch” over the radio, and another male colleague’s flying her underwear like a flag off the train — all of which became part of a sexual-harassment lawsuit Melanie filed against the railroads. In 2002, a jury awarded her $450,000 in damages, a verdict overturned by a federal judge who did not question the facts of the case but decided that the matter had been handled appropriately.

    And she thinks Trump would have treated her any better???

    Erm, maybe there's a reason my parents moved to Pittsburgh when they had me, rather than raise me in some rural part of the state. Thanks, Mom and Dad!

      1. At the very least, women would be required to submit to a judging to assess their hotness vs. Ivankiarium and be assigned jobs based on how visible they should be.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *