6 thoughts on “America’s wittiest Nobel-laureate economist tackles the prickly subject of government regulation”
Nut graf:
I can personally attest to the emotional side of the argument [about the merits of government regulation], since I see it reflected in my own extended family, where the Trump supporters tend to have strong business connections and seem to take regulation as a personal affront, as if it stands as a barrier to their self-actualization and personal fulfillment.
Sick burn! Angry arguments over Thanksgiving dinner at the Shiller household.
Oh and the picture? I just like |it.| As with any other distinctive object you can imagine, there are |associations and collectors.|
The older I get, the more complex I realize things are and that there aren't any quick fixes or silver bullets. Does that put me in the minority(again)?
Well you're in a different group than 45*, whose got nothing but silver bullets and quick fixes in the form of executive orders that are powerless statements of his desires or unconstitutional or both.
Trump supporters tend to have strong business connections and seem to take regulation as a personal affront, as if it stands as a barrier to their self-actualization and personal fulfillment.
Nut graf:
Sick burn! Angry arguments over Thanksgiving dinner at the Shiller household.
Oh and the picture? I just like |it.| As with any other distinctive object you can imagine, there are |associations and collectors.|
The older I get, the more complex I realize things are and that there aren't any quick fixes or silver bullets. Does that put me in the minority(again)?
Well you're in a different group than 45*, whose got nothing but silver bullets and quick fixes in the form of executive orders that are powerless statements of his desires or unconstitutional or both.
I ♥ judges.
Me too!
<img src="http://cartype.com/pics/1223/full/pontiac-gto_the-judge_sf1_s_69.jpg"</img>
Oh, for fuck's sake. That is all.