gnarly

Government to run out of money too soon because Riches are delaying estimated tax payments in hopes of a tax cut

21 thoughts on “Government to run out of money too soon because Riches are delaying estimated tax payments in hopes of a tax cut

  1. Mnuchin said that a clean increase with no extra partisan provisions would be desirable, exactly what you would expect him to say. The timing however, was a bit of a surprise as earlier guidance had been that Congress had until October. The problem is that Treasury Department data shows tax receipts coming in much weaker this year than they had last year.

    That’s the kind of thing that normally happens amidst large-scale job losses or a recession, but we’re not in a recession. Instead the problem seems to be that high-income taxpayers who have some ability to time when they receive taxable income are deliberately stalling.

    The reason for the stalling is that the Trump administration keeps saying it’s about to pass a tax cut: On Thursday Trump said his tax bill is “moving along in Congress” and “doing very well” there even though no such bill exists. So people want to receive their income after the tax cut, when rates are lower.

    So actually the hed's wrong: they're not delaying estimated payments but rather deferring realized income. Fuck 'em anyway.

  2. “Why would we make it easier for them to pass unpaid-for tax cuts by giving away a vote on raising the debt ceiling,” mused Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT) in an interview with Politico’s Burgess Everett and Rachael Bade. Minority Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL) told the same team, “put me in the camp” of Democrats looking for leverage. Democratic Senate Leader Chuck Schumer, initially, kept quiet. But by the end of last week, Pelosi had hopped on the Murphy train, arguing that “I don’t have any intention of supporting a lifting of the debt ceiling to enable the Republicans to give another tax break to the wealthy in our country.”

    Ding ding ding!

  3. I haven't had a lot of hope lately, but possibly Thursday can be one of the most historical days in American history. It's all up to one human being having the courage and integrity to stand up to corruption and lunacy.

  4. I'm unconvinced. He's a professional spook, still bound by some semblance of honor and integrity, and probably won't say anything that could compromise the ongoing investigation. My only real hope is whatever he does say will be sufficient to prompt closed-door sessions where he can sing.

  5. He won't compromise the investigation–nor should he–but he might sing about Donald's attempt to get him to sweep it under the rug. Setting my alarm now!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *