Apple_Newton_MP100

How does NYT oligarch-fluffer Andrew “Ross” Sorkin come down on the was-Steve-Jobs-a-monster-or-a-living-god question? Well, how do you THINK a CNBC star would view it?

4 thoughts on “How does NYT oligarch-fluffer Andrew “Ross” Sorkin come down on the was-Steve-Jobs-a-monster-or-a-living-god question? Well, how do you THINK a CNBC star would view it?

  1. Mr. Gibney, a talented and persuasive filmmaker, uses the next two hours to seemingly make the case that Jobs, the man, doesn’t deserve the iconic status he attained. Through a series of interviews — including one with the mother of a child Jobs denied for years was his own — Mr. Gibney paints Jobs as “ruthless, deceitful and cruel.” Mr. Gibney goes through a laundry list of Jobs’s sins: backdated stock options, factory conditions in China and secret agreements with Silicon Valley rivals to prevent employee-poaching.

    But all these efforts to paint Jobs as a hero or a villain miss a larger truth: He can be both and still be worthy of acclaim.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *