5 thoughts on “Again with the gays – child molesters comparison”
[Scalia] also allowed that the First Amendment protects political and religious minorities but suggested that there was no principled way for courts to make further distinctions based on the text of the Constitution. “What about pederasts?” he asked. “What about child abusers?”
What about women? Or black people? Or anybody else who isn't an old fat white guy like me? Nino truly understands the idea of human rights.
It's amazing how someone could look at the Constitution and come away with the idea that rights should be voted on by people that want to keep said rights away from everyone except themselves.
[Scalia] also allowed that the First Amendment protects political and religious minorities but suggested that there was no principled way for courts to make further distinctions based on the text of the Constitution. “What about pederasts?” he asked. “What about child abusers?”
What about women? Or black people? Or anybody else who isn't an old fat white guy like me? Nino truly understands the idea of human rights.
If I didn't know better about Scalia, I'd otherwise bet that that was a case of poor reporting. Alas, it's probably perfectly accurate.
It's amazing how someone could look at the Constitution and come away with the idea that rights should be voted on by people that want to keep said rights away from everyone except themselves.
Shut up, Scalia.
Who the hell ever decided that this guy was smart? He's nothing more than a Yahoo commenter in a black robe