2 thoughts on “Hurry up with that battery, Glass: No growth = death?”
Presumably the x-axis is logarithmic; the y-axis marches to a syncopated beat.
One of several nut grafs:
For instance, Peter Victor of York University in Canada published a study titled “Growth, degrowth and climate change: A scenario analysis,” in which he compared Canadian carbon emissions under three economic paths to the year 2035.b Limiting growth to zero, he found, had a modest impact on carbon spewed into the air. Only the “de-growth” situation — in which Canadians’ income per person shrank to its level in 1976 and the average working hours of employed Canadians declined by 75 percent — managed to slash emissions in a big way.
And it is creeping into international diplomacy, showing up forcefully in India’s demand for “carbon space” from the rich world, which at its logical limit would demand that advanced nations deliver negative emissions — suck more carbon out of the atmosphere than they put in — so the world’s poor countries could burn their way to development as the rich countries have done for the last two centuries
Presumably the x-axis is logarithmic; the y-axis marches to a syncopated beat.
One of several nut grafs:
What about the power of snark? Is anyone working on harnessing that?