Ohio goes forward with plan to make sure women don’t have rights

11 thoughts on “Ohio goes forward with plan to make sure women don’t have rights

  1. So, they require the clinics to have a transfer agreement, but ban them from making said transfer agreements with public hospitals, leaving on Catholic hospitals, no doubt, and won't grant them the allowed variance for using doctors as intermediaries? Oh, I smell a court case. Let's hope Hillary/Bernie/Joe/DemToBeNamedLater has replaced at least one of the SJs by the time it gets there.

    1. Yes, that's been the plan they've used in secret for years. A court case is already happening and the first hearing is Monday.

  2. If women truly wanted rights, then they wouldn't vote for social conservative politicians in such large numbers.
    A bit like Log Cabin Republicans and Hippies for the Atomic Bomb. It just strikes me as weird.

      1. I don't think he meant it that way, I think he meant he didn't understand people voting against their own self-interests. It just came out phrased wrong.

  3. Isn't this transfer agreement in violation of EMTALA (BTW, thanks Reagan for signing off on socialized medicine)? Any licensed ER has to accept and stabilize any patient that presents to the facility regardless of the ability to pay or race, color, creed, etc. Come on feds this is an easy one to pick off.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *