75 thoughts on “Football: Now with US Content

  1. Also too–I bitched about this on the other NFL thread, but since I'm still cranky about it:

    Crap…from the crawl in the Carolina – NY Giants game:

    Chargers have the most support among owners to move to Los Angeles

    Well., it could be worse–it could be the Raiders. Plus, if the replies to my previous complaints about poaching other California teams is representative, San Diegans won't hate LA so much as they'll be glad to hand over their problem to us FFS…

      1. That would be my preference since St Louis poached them from LA, but the rumor mill has it that this is less likely to happen.

    1. At some point, the NFL is going to make it like the requirement to play in London. "Sorry, Bears, this year you're the Los Angeles team. You can move back soon."

    2. I don't understand this: surely in terms of regional rivalries and 'local derbies' the Chargers should stay in SD?

      That's the whole thinking behind the NHL team in Seattle (or even Portland) – and it's worked out well for the 'Cascadia Cup' in MLS soccerball.

      But as for the NFL, the Raiders and Rams have already flip-flopped back and forth to/from LA. Why uproot yet another city's team?

    1. LOL. Even when the Packers sucked, a Christmas Eve game at Lambeau would be a no-brainer, even, especially, if it were 10 below. Priests would have blown off Midnight mass to attend. Maybe LA really isn't ready for their own team yet.

      1. Honestly, the only good things to come out of LA getting a team would be that other owners could no longer blackmail their cities with the "if you don't spend a fuckton of taxpayer dollars on a new stadium we're headed to Los Angeles" threat.

        Well, that and getting to see my team when it comes out here to play. Fuck, I'd do that on Christmas Eve…

  2. Damn, that Odell Beckham – whoever that defender is fight seems to have given the Giants new life…

    ETA: aaand of course Eli tosses a pick right after I type that. Guess it's safe to walk the dogs now…

    ETA again: glad I waited. Damn, we've got a game here!

    1. 1. NFL were the ones who penny-pinched and pulled the plug on NFL Europe.
      2. Hardcore fans already have our teams. WE don't change our alliances once they're formed.
      3. You want to keep sending the Jaguars over to us? And you want us to like your 'product'?
      4. I would infer that the Wembley games have all the passion of a Pro Bowl crowd (see 2.)
      5. Same reason why an EPL "39th Game" in the US or Asia is a fucking stupid idea.

      HTH. GTFO.

      1. I don't think he has to practice, and I'm pretty sure that's just how old white guys from Baltimore look, based on Deford and John Waters.

  3. How the fuck my team pulled this off is beyond me. IDK, maybe the Steelers are actually good or something.

    (Now watch them lose to the angry birds next week…)

  4. Do they use their heads in soccer? (Also, I know more than one girl who fractured her jaw and got concussed doing competitive cheerleading).

  5. …among college athletes, concussions were most likely in wrestling, followed by men’s ice hockey and then women’s ice hockey. And women’s soccer and women’s basketball, in that order, were right behind football in terms of the danger of concussion…

    BUT head injuries are just one peril, and not necessarily the chief one, even in football. There are many more deaths among football players of all ages from indirect trauma, including heatstroke and cardiac arrest, than from such direct trauma as head and spinal-cord injuries.

    Douglas Casa, the chief executive officer of the Korey Stringer Institute at the University of Connecticut, said that from 2000 through 2009, which was the last full decade studied, such indirect-trauma deaths outnumbered direct-trauma deaths by 108 to 41.

    Still tl:dr: play safe, kids!

Leave a Reply to natl_[gorgeous]_cmdr Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *