Guns? We Don’t Need No Stinkin’ Training or Background Checks September 15, 2016 PubOption 142044 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fwonkville.net%2F2016%2F09%2F15%2Fguns-we-dont-need-no-stinkin-training-or-background-checks%2FGuns%3F+We+Don%27t+Need+No+Stinkin%27+Training+or+Background+Checks2016-09-15+12%3A47%3A11Anonymous+Wonkerhttp%3A%2F%2Fwonkville.net%2F2016%2F09%2F15%2Fguns-we-dont-need-no-stinkin-training-or-background-checks%2F 00
As long as they Darwin only themselves, I'm OK with this. Sadly, there will probably be too many innocent casualties. Reply
Nevada has an initiative on the ballot this year, Question 1 would close the so-called gun show loophole and require universal background checks. Of course it [will not pass] because the NRA is on it. And my neighbors are dumb AF. Reply
Less checking and training than to drive a car? What could possibly go wrong?
As long as they Darwin only themselves, I'm OK with this. Sadly, there will probably be too many innocent casualties.
Mods, I think that there's a post of mine from last night awaiting approval.
Nevada has an initiative on the ballot this year, Question 1 would close the so-called gun show loophole and require universal background checks. Of course it [will not pass] because the NRA is on it. And my neighbors are dumb AF.