110 thoughts on “Whoa. Scalia’s Dead

      1. Teams of Republicans are on their way to see if they can reanimate his corpse until next January.

        But this does give me hope that Cheney may not be immortal, either.

        1. Obama could nominate Turtle McConnell and the Rs still wouldn't confirm. Attorney Wonkaderos, what does a 4-4 Supremes tie mean legally? Punt? Ground rule-double?

          1. My twitter lawyer friends say tie goes to the runner (any 4-4 rulings end up going by whatever the appellate court ruling was before it got kicked up to SCOTUS).

          2. Sounds reasonable. I predict that the Court will put a lot of things on hold until a new Justice is confirmed – accepting new cases and hearing the ones already on the docket.

            BTW, Obama's Clean Power Plan might just survive, now.

        1. I would never try that on the FP, at least not directly. Maybe just some reference to plastic bags. Thankfully, Wonkville is a place where you can say the meanest things in the world. The moderators here have no standards.

      1. Shades of "The Ruling Class". The 13th Earl of Gurney, a judge who missed being able to pass sentence of death, died hanging himself in a cocked hat and a ballet skirt.

          1. It really is odd. I guess because it's Saturday, and the day before Valentine's Day, so only reporters with not enough seniority to get today off are working, and none of them wanted to be the one to confirm it?

          2. True. There's that one asshole site that will put up a backdated post claiming every marginally famous person's death is a hoax, making it nearly impossible to know when something really is a hoax.

        1. Very true — the story I linked to was from this morning, then it started trickling out as semi-confirmed around 4pm, but no one really wanted to fully believe it until a couple minutes before I posted it here.

  1. Rumor has it, what with the resort being in the Big Bend area, that a large bag of small cacti buttons were found next to the body. Police are looking for someone named Don Juan Matus.

    1. He'll find someone. The appointee will go through hell, but will still be so watertight that it will make the Republicans seethe.

  2. I wonder how Cruz and Trump will react. Some sort of two-step. First, express high-drama condolences, then second, pivot to something linking his passing to the tyranny that is Obama.

    1. Cruz already tweeted some craziness about how the only respectful thing would be for Obama to leave the seat open for the next president to make the appointment.

      But they Pubs have a debate AGAIN tonight, right? Oh, boy.

        1. Cruz was basically making a veiled threat to block Obama's nominee until Jan 20, 2017, no matter who he picks. Insane and unprofessional.

          1. Unless you're essentially a bomb-hurling anarchist like Cruz, who wants to destroy government at every level. For him this is perfectly rational. But I hope it blows up in his goddamn face like an IED.

  3. See. guys, this is what happens when you decide to go hunting with the boys for Valentine's Day. Has anyone checked for his wife's alibi?

  4. It was sometime around the time Glen Frey died – it had been a rough beginning of the year – when I suddenly thought ;"God DAMMIT…when are all the assholes going to start dying?"

    Well…

  5. I was out when this news broke, holy shit. Fully expecting a 4-4 split while the Senate tries to block every nominee to see if they can get the presidency.

  6. A spokesman for Mike Lee (R-Utah) is saying the Senate is likely to try to block anyone Obama nominates to let the next president pick. They want a non-functional Supreme Court for an entire year. This is suddenly going to be the biggest campaign issue. It should have been anyway but now it's out in the open.

    1. I'm sure they will give that a good go for a couple-few months until it totally blows up in their face, making them look like obstinate babies (AGAIN). Also, that means they cannot take a single recess until the inauguration, since it's valid to do recess appointments for SCOTUS (that's how Eisenhower got William Brennan on the court). So I really don't think they can sustain it.

      1. So they have to keep Congress in session for 11 months… when most are likely to be paying attention to campaigning, even if they're not up for election in 2016? This is going to be amazing.

        1. Also, of the current court, the longest it took to get any of them approved was Thomas, at 106 days. No way can the Congress creatures make good on this threat (I'd say without looking like jackasses, but I think they will not only fail to block, they will also look like jackasses).

          1. I want you to be right so badly right now. I actually think you are tbh but politics have been really weird lately.

  7. My hope is that the RepubliCants' refusal to confirm a nominee will backfire in November. I really hope that will be the case…

  8. @NateSilver538

    It would be easier not to "politicize someone's death" if they didn't hold a position with a lifetime appointment.

  9. @RalstonReports

    Have to admit it would be pretty outrageous for the guy charged with the constitutional power to nominate judges to nominate one.

  10. So as a woman living under a very conservative district court, should I just assume that I have no rights until we get that spot filled?

  11. Ted Cruz: "Today our Nation mourns the loss of one of the greatest Justices in history – Justice Antonin Scalia. A champion of our liberties and a stalwart defender of the Constitution, he will go down as one of the few Justices who single-handedly changed the course of legal history."

  12. Also too, Michele Bachmann said this on twitter, about a man she surely met multiple times:

    "God bless Anthony Scalia, finest Sup Ct Justice RIP"

  13. For some reason, I am suddenly reminded of the title of Boris Vian's 1946 novel J'irai cracher sur vos tombes. Don't really know why.

  14. Among Scalia's oddest rulings was one saying that "squish videos" (in which women in high heels crush puppies) were protected free speech.

    Seriously.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *